Chandran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/06/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.8532 of 2019 Chandran ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Varasanadu Police Station, Theni District Cr.No.70/2019 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.A.Uthayakumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anantha Devi, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Cr.No.70/2019 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A-2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 25(1A) of the Indian Arms Act 1959, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that based on the confession given by A-1, the petitioner herein has been implicated in this case. He further submitted that A-1 was already arrested and remanded to judicial custody and no previous case is pending against the petitioner herein. Hence, he prayed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has submitted that the respondent police was on regular patrolling duty, the petitioner and other accused person were found in possession of single barrel country made gun without any valid license. She further submitted

that only based on the confession given by A-1, the petitioner herein has been implicated in this case. She further submitted that A-1 was already arrested and remanded to judicial custody and hence, she strongly opposed this petition. However, she fairly conceded that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. 5.Taking into consideration of the fact that only based on the confession given by A-1, this petitioner has been implicated in the above case and also the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatty, Theni District and the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

[a]If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation. [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 19/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-II) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti, Theni District.

2.Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theni District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Varasanadu Police Station, Theni District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.A.UTHAYAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-10138[I] dated 20/06/2019 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8532 of 2019 sji TK/JC/SAR.2/26.06.2019/3P/6C