Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.216 of 2015 1 PERUMAL 2 KAMAYEE ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL LAND GRABBING CELL, DINDIGUL DIST.

CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.RANJIT Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) and there is no representation for the petitioners.

2. The respondent police is present before this Court.

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side), on instruction from the respondent police, submits that petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed.

4. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this petition is closed.

sd/- 17/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL LAND GRABBING CELL, DINDIGUL.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.216 of 2015 Date :17/02/2015 AA/24.02.2015/1p- 3c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/