S. Rajeev Kannan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.21695 of 2015 1 S. RAJEEV KANNAN 2 K.SUBRAMANIAM 3 MRS.S.SELVI 4 S.SIVAKANNAN 5 S.SABARIKANNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S M.SHEIK ABDULLAH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 406 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in unknown crime Number of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners joined together, harassed the defacto complainant and and drawn her out of the matrimonial home.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.
4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side).
5. Considering the nature of the offence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Judicial Magistrate, No.V, Madurai on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the first and other petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10:30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 18/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S M.SHEIK ABDULLAH Advocate SR.No.66576 RL/6C/DP/JGB/23/11/2015
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.21695 of 2015 Date :18/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/