C. Paranthaman, v. The Inspector Of Police,

EFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/07/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.9008 of 2019

1. C. Paranthaman,,

2. G. Prabavathi,, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police,, Ayankudi Police Station, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

Crime No.12 of 2019.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: M/s. N.SARAVANAN, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For anticipatory bail in cr.no.12 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b) and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.12 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that even as per the FIR, on 14.01.2019, at about 5.30 p.m, due to civil dispute, the petitioners thrown acid on the two children of the defacto complainant and caused injuries. He further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

submitted that the petitioners have stopped the construction in the disputed land and they decided to measure the disputed land and also paid the amount for measuring the boundary line in disputed land. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has submitted that the petitioners thrown acid on the two children of the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, he strongly opposed this petition.

5.The allegation against the petitioners is that they have thrown acid on the two children of the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Taking into consideration of the said allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

sd/- 01/07/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,, AYANKUDI POLICE STATION, PALANI TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.MATHURAM LAW ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-10763[I] dated 01/07/2019 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9008 of 2019 Date :01/07/2019 das AE/JC/SAR-II (09.07.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/