← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21806/2015ordered

Maayi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-11-23Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21806 of 2015 1 MAAYI 2 SAKTHIVEL 3 POONGODIRAJA 4 CHELLADURAI 5 PANDIDURAI 6 THANGAMURUGAN 7 MARUTHUPAUL 8 SATHAYAMOORTHY 9 KANNAN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 6, 10 TO 12 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VATHALAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

(CRIME NO.428 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 6, 10 to 12, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 336 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. r/w 3(i) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.428 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused have assaulted the de-facto complainant and caused injury to him.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that it is a case in counter and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 23/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VATHALAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.66924

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21806 of 2015 Date :23/11/2015 GJM/DP-JGB/SAR II/24.11.2015: 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/