Selin@Selin Marry v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21829 of 2015 1 SELIN@SELIN MARRY 2 WILSON 3 RENISH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKALAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.1001/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.RUSSEL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.ANABARASAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 379(NP) & 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.1001 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 19/11/2015 / TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PADMANABHAPURAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKALAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.R.RUSSEL RAJ Advocate SR.No.66173 RL/6C/DP/JGB/23/11/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21829 of 2015 Date :19/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/