← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2608/2021granted

Dinakaran v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2021-02-19Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/02/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR

1. Dinakaran

2. Amuthan ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 3 -VsState Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Kulasekarapattinam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

Crime No.269/2020.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.M.Laxmi Mahendraa, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.269 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 353 and 332 IPC and Section 4 of the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.269 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners' father availed loan from Bank and thereafter, defaulted in paying interest. Therefore, the defacto complainant and other Bank Officials went to the house of the petitioners' father to recover the amount. At that time, the petitionerd and other accused are said to have attacked the defacto complainant and other Bank Officials. Hence, the present complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the 1/3

father of the petitioners died before one and half year and hence, they are not aware about the same. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondent police submitted that the investigation is pending. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 19/02/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUCHENDUR.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULASEKARAPATTINAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.M.LAXMI MAHENDRAA, Advocate ( SR-1256[I] dated 19/02/2021 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2608 of 2021 Date :19/02/2021 IAS MS/VR/SAR-3/25.02.2021/3P.6C 3/3