Thirunagalingam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21878 of 2015 1 THIRUNAGALINGAM 2 AMUTHA 3 THARSHINI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.1 to 3 Vs State represented by THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAINARKOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, (CRIME NO. 190 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.SENTHIL Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3 in Crime No.190 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that A1 entered into a sale agreement with the de-facto complainant and after that, the property was sold to the third party and the same was question by her, the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 20/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAINARKOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.SENTHIL Advocate SR.No.66538 sm:sks-rr:SAR I:24.11.2015:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21878 of 2015 Date :20/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/