Pandiammal v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21896 of 2015 1 PANDIAMMAL 2 KAPOOR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs 1 State represented by THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL,DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR NO NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 2 KARUPPIAH ... RESPONDENTS / DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S.R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard both sides.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the respondent has conducted enquiry and the same has been closed. 3.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 04/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL,DINDIGUL DISTRICT, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI sm:sks-rr:SAR I:09.12.2015:1P/3C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.21896 of 2015 Date :04/12/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/