Chinnamani v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21927 of 2015 1 CHINNAMANI 2 JEYAPANDI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR NO.123/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2 in Crime No.123 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners trespassed into the de-facto complainant's house and attacked him with deadly weapons and also threatened him with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 20/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.66480. TS/23.11.2015/2P-6C/MPA/SAR I

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21927 of 2015 Date :20/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/