← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2241/2025allowed

E.Chandran v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-02-05Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05.02.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL E.Chandran ... Petitioner/Accused (rank not known) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Sub Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.116 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Krishna Kumar, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.116 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 03.02.2025 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) praying to grant 1/5

an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023 and Section 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.116 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 29.01.2025 at 07.50 a.m., while A.Kumar, Special Deputy Tahsildar (Minerals), Geology and Mines Department, Tirunelveli along with another official was inspecting the vehicles, they found a vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 72 CV 4431 carrying 5 units of M-sand without any valid transit pass. On seeing them, the driver of the vehicle stopped the vehicle and fled away from the scene of occurrence. They seized the vehicle. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.S.Krishna Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrayed as an accused falsely. The petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent-police submits that the petitioner transported 5 units of M-sand in a tipper lorry without proper transit pass. No previous case is pending 2/5

against the petitioner. Accordingly, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. Considering the nature of the offences alleged against the petitioner and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a first offender, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District,, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District;

(ii) Thereafter, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondentpolice weekly twice i.e., on Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; (iii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity;

3/5

(iv) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District; (v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence; and (vi) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, concerned Magistrate, or Trial Court as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by them as laid down by the Hon-ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

sd/- 05/02/2025 / TRUE COPY / /02/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MBI To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

4/5

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2241 of 2025 Date :05/02/2025 ED/ SKN /SAR- (19/02/2025) 5P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5