Suthar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.22113 of 2015 SUTHAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT CR.NO.612 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S M.R.SREENIVASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b) and 307 of I.P.C,.

in Crime No.612 of 2015, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is said to have assaulted the de-facto complainant and due to that, the de-facto complainant said to have sustained simple injury.

3. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that the de-facto complainant sustained simple injury and he was discharged from the hospital.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(crl. Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eranial and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIAL.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S M.R.SREENIVASAN Advocate SR.No.66972 akm/23.11.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22113 of 2015 Date :23/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/