Ananthavalli v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its The Principal Secretary To Government

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR H.C.P.(MD)No.187 of 2023 Ananthavalli .. Petitioner / mother of the detenu Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its The Principal Secretary to Government Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy.

.. Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records, relating to the detention order passed by the second respondent in C.No.

121/Detention/C.P.O/TC/2022 dated 31.08.2022 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Muthu @ Muthukrishnan, S/o.Palanichamy, aged about 24 years, (now detained at the Central Prison, Trichy,) before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) The petitioner is mother of the detenu viz., Muthu @ Muthukrishnan, S/o.Palanichamy, aged about 24 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in C.No. 121/Detention/C.P.O/TC/2022 dated 31.08.2022 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

3. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would mainly focus his argument on the ground that the detaining authority has relied upon the order passsed in Crl.M.P.No.5207/2021 dated 25.08.2021 and came to the conclusion that in a similar case bail has been granted and that there is likelihood of the detenu released on bail. The learned counsel submitted that the detaining authority was aware of the fact that the detenu filed bail application in the ground case and the same is pending. The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore submitted that the order relied upon by the detaining authority is not similar and there is non application of mind on the part of the detaining authority.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the Habeas Corpus Petition by filing his counter.

5. On carefully going through the detention order, it is seen that in the order that was relied upon by the detaining authority in Crl.M.P.No. 5207/2021 dated 25.08.2021, the accused therein was enlarged on bail on the ground that there was no serious objection and that there was no mentioning about previous cases. However, in the present case, there are two previous cases and hence, the order that was relied upon by the detaining authority cannot be considered to be an order passed in a similar case.

6. In view of the above, the detention order suffers from non application of mind and the same is liable to be interfered with by this Court. The impugned detention order is, therefore, liable to be quashed.

7. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in C.No.121/Detention/C.P.O/TC/2022 dated 31.08.2022 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Muthu @

Muthukrishnan, S/o.Palanichamy, aged about 24 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.

(M.S.R.,J.) (M.N.K.,J.) 10.07.2023 Internet : Yes Intex : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No RM/RR

To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and M.NIRMAL KUMAR,J.

RM/RR H.C.P.(MD)No.187 of 2023 10.07.2023