K. Selvaraj v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.22424 & 22425 of 2015 K. SELVARAJ ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 IN CRL.O.P(MD)NO.22424/2015 PARVEEN KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.1 IN CRL.O.P(MD)NO.22425/2015 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.
(CR NO.22 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Petitioner : Mr.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) IN BOTH THE PETITIONS PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 & 1, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 417 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.22 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first accused and the defacto complainant are lovers and at the time they took photographs together and they have gone to picnic spot as lovers. Subsequently, the first accused did not pick up the phone call from the defacto complainant and he refused to continue love with her and he also threatened her with dire consequences.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and the first accused and the defacto complainant never loved each other and it is only infatuation and the first accused refused to continue to talk to the defacto complainant and on that ground she has given a false complaint. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalaym, Theni District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.22425 of 2015/A1 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders and the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.22424 of 2015/A2 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM,THENI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.68234 +1. CC to M/S M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.68235
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.22424 & 22425 of 2015 Date :26/11/2015 NS/PM-MP/SAR II/01.12.2015 : 2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/