R.Rajith v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.22345 of 2014 1 R.RAJITH 2 A.RAMACHANDRAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEETHAPPANALLUR POLICE STATION, THENKASI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.CR. NO. 605/2014. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R. ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.605 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 427, 294(b), 323, 336 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner is the brother-in-law of the de-facto complainant and 2nd petitioner is the father-in-law of the de-facto complainant and they said to have attacked the de-facto complainant.

3. It is represented that the injured had been discharged from the hospital.

4. Having regard to the nature of offences said to have been committed by the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them, but with conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the first petitioner shall report before the respondent Police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks without fail and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

required;

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 08/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TENKASI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,SEETHAPPANALLUR POLICE STATION, THENKASI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S. R. ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.1249 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22345 of 2014 Date :08/01/2015 AA/12.01.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/