Selvi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.22560 of 2015 1 SELVI 2 THIRUMALAISAMY@RAVI 3 CHINADURAI ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 363 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.SANTHOSHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNIDEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, in Crime No.363 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 447, 427, 506(ii) of IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused trespassed into property of the defacto complainant and caused damage to the crops.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the first petitioner has filed a partition suit and got a preliminary decree in her favour and the defacto complainant preventing the petitioners from enjoying the property and hence, the first petitioner gave a complaint against the defacto complainant and as per the direction of this Court a case was also registered against the accused persons and aggrieved over the same, the present complaint has been given against the petitioners. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) on instructions submitted that no-one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no-one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PALANI

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KEERANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S P.SANTHOSHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.68322

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22560 of 2015 Date :30/11/2015 GJM/NGM/SS/SARI-1.12.2015-2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/