R.Mahendrakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22552 of 2014 1.R.Mahendra Kumar 2.Arjunan ... Petitioners/A1 and A2 Vs.

1.The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kalakadu Police Station, Tirunelveli District (Crime No.102 of 2014) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.S.Murugan ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.102 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same in so far as the petitioners herein. For Petitioners :

Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : M/S.P.Krishnaveni ******

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.102 of 2014 on the file of the 1st respondent police.

2. It is seen that the above said case has been registered for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 392 of IPC., against the petitioners / Accused.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent/defacto complainant, have appeared in persons and their identifications were also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police.

4. The counsel appearing on either side would submit that a Compromise Memo has been filed stating that, since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case in Crime No.102 of 2014, pending on the file of the first respondent.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the Compromise Memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping these matters pending. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Crime No.102 of 2014, on the file of the first respondent , is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The compromise memo shall form part of this order. Joint Compromise memo vide spearte sheet.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

MPK To 1.The District Munsif-Cum- Judicial Magistrte, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police,Kalakadu Police Station, Tirunelveli District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu,Advocate, SR No.65839 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22552 of 2014 06.11.2015 TS.DP/JGB 02.12.2015 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/