Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22738/2015allowed

V. Saravanan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-12-07Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.12.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22738 of 2015 1.V.Saravanan 2.Anandhi ... Petitioners/A1 and A2 Vs.

1.The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District (Crime No.534 of 2012) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.Saranya ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records in connection with the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.216 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti and quash the same. For Petitioners :

Mr.A.S.Vaigunth For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 :

Mr.K.Sankar ******

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.216 of 2013, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti.

2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.534 of 2015 has been registered against the petitioners/accused, for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 506(i) of IPC.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent/defacto complainant,

have appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police.

4. The counsel appearing on either side would submit that a Compromise Memo has been filed stating that, since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the Compromise Memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping these matters pending. Therefore, the proceedings in C.C.No.216 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti , in so far as the petitioners are concerned, is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The compromise memo shall form part of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To (*)JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO XEROX COPIES ARE ENCLOSED HEREWITH

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti 2.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

MPK RL/4C/GSV/AN/31/12/2015 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22738 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 07.12.2015