← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22802/2015allowed

Pura Pandi @ Pandiyarajan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-12-09Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.12.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22802 of 2015 1.Pura Pandi @ Pandiyarajan 2.Muthukannan ... Petitioners Vs.

1.

The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, D1 Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.

2.

Jothimanikandan ... Respondents Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in Crime No.1052 of 2015 pending on the file of the 1st respondent herein and quash the same.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.K.Karunanithi For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 :

Mr.T.Sugadev ******

O R D E R

The petition has been filed seeking to quash the case registered in Crime No.1052 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police, pursuant to amicable settlement effected between the parties.

2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.187 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 387 and 506(ii) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / Accused.

3. When the matters is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police.

4. The counsel appearing on either side filed two separate memos of compromise duly stating that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case in Crime No.1052 of 2015 pending on the file of the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the memo of compromise, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Crime No.1052 of 2015 on the file of the first respondent in respect of the petitioners / accused alone, is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The joint compromise memos shall form part of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) Encl: Joint the Memo of Compromise xerox /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar RR To:

1.

The Inspector of Police, D1 Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.

2.

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to Mr.M.Karunanithi Advocate Sr.No.70840 GJM/GSV/AN/23.12.2015-2P-4C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22802 of 2015 09.12.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/