← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3038/2022dismissed

Shanmugam v. The District Collector

2022-02-16Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P (MD).No. 3038 of 2022 Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector,

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Thasildhar, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Superintendent of Police,

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.

6. The Inspector of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Narikudi, Virudhunagar District.

7. Veerakumar ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 to 6 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members and also directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to convene a peace committee meeting to settle the issues based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajeshkumar For R1 to R6 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus, seeking police protection and also to direct the third respondent to convene a peace committee meeting to settle the issue based on his representation, dated 27.01.2022.

2.It is seen that the petitioner's son involved in Crime No.14 of 2020, registered on the file of the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Arupukottai, alleging that his son cheated the girl aged about 22 years and on the pretext of false marriage he had physical relationship with the victim. In this regard, the petitioner was enquired and till now the accused is not secured. 3.On perusal of the representation submitted by the petitioner revealed that the respondents trespassed into the house and damaged the valuables along with the complainant party. The petitioner is not permitted to do his agricultural activities in his farm and he is not able to use his tractor.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner's son had fallen in love with one Vanitha and he had physical relationship with her and thereafter, he refused to marry her. Therefore, on the complaint lodged by the said Vanitha, the case has been registered in Crime No.14 of 2020 as against the son, Thirumurugan and it is pending for investigation. The petitioner was never obstructed by anybody to do his activities. 5.In view of the above, the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) lr Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1. The District Collector,

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Thasildhar, Tiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Superintendent of Police,

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.

6. The Inspector of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Narikudi, Virudhunagar District.

+1 CC to M/s.K.RAJESH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-6905[F] dated 17/02/2022 ) W.P (MD).No.3038 of 2022 16.02.2022 MGJ(02.03.2022) 3P 8C