Manoharan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.22912 of 2014 1 MANOHARAN 2 GUNASEKARAN 3 PANJU ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 - 3 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.74/2014 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.SUBASH BABU Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A1 to A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 294(b) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassement of Women Act, Crime No.74 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioners are attacked the de facto complainant and demanded more dowry from her.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the investigation of this case is pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-IV, Madurai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 06/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO. IV MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.74/2014 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.SUBASH BABU Advocate SR.No.36500 DM 7 7 15 2P 6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22912 of 2014 Date :06/07/2015 2P; 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/