Subramanian v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.22913 of 2014 1 SUBRAMANIAN 2 MAYILAMMAL (WRONGLY NAME MENTIONED IN THE FIR AS MARIAMMAL), 3 ARUNACHALAM ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.63/2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.
63 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that the accused have demanded additional dowry and harassed the defacto Complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further that due to matrimonial dispute, all the family members of the husband has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the State.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam on their executing a separate bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 25/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM.
2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate SR.No.33983. TS/26.06.2015/2P -6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.22913 of 2014 Date :25/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/