← Library
Madras High CourtTR CMP(MD)/162/2019ordered

V.Loga Saranya, v. R.Venkatesh,S/O.N.Ramakrishnan

2019-04-24Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU TR. C.M.P(MD).No.162 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD)No.3683 of 2019 V.Loga Saranya ... Petitioner/ Respondent Vs.

R.Venkatesh ... Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER:- Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 pending on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirapalli and to transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai and to try the same, along with H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2019, on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai. For petitioner :Mr.D.Sakthivel Murugan For respondent :Mr.J.K.Jayaseelan

ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner / wife seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 from the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirapalli to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai and to try the same along with H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2019.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 29.08.2018. After marriage, both of them lived happily for some time. Later, due to misunderstanding, the respondent herein / husband of the petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirapalli for declaration of the marriage as null and void, with the false allegations. Thereafter, the petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2019 for restitution of conjugal rights before the Family Court, Sivagangai. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent being a resident of Tiruchirappalli has filed the above petition at the Family Court, Tiruchirapalli, whereas the petitioner is residing at Sivagangai, along with her aged parents, and as she is depending upon her aged parents and she has no wherewithal, it is very difficult for her to travel about 150 kms from Sivagangai to Tiruchirapalli by spending money and to attend each and every

hearing of the case. He would further submit that as the issues involved in both the H.M.O.Ps. are interrelated to each other, this Court may direct the Family Court, Sivagangai to tag H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 along with H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2019, which is pending on his file, conduct joint trial and dispose of the same on merits.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed to grant the relief. However, he would submit that in the event of allowing this petition, this Court may direct the Court below to dispose of both the cases within a stipulated time.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. I am satisfied with the reasons stated by the petitioner. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in 2008 (9)SCC 353 (Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta), has held that convenience of woman is to be taken into consideration first while considering transfer application. Further, as rightly stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the issue involved in both the H.M.O.Ps are interrelated to each other and therefore, the same can be directed to try together. The joint trial would not only save the valuable time of the parties but also the Court. In view of the above, I am inclined to allow this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this petition is allowed with the following directions:

i) The learned Family Court Judge, Tiruchirappalli is directed to transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

ii) The learned Family Court Judge, Sivagangai, after obtaining the records on transfer, is directed to tag H.M.O.P.No.413 of 2018 along with H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2019 pending on his file, conduct joint trial and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of records.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (ADI) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

To.

1.The Family Court Judge, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Family Court Judge, Sivagangai.

+1 CC to M/s.C.JEYA PRAKASH, Advocate ( SR-62066[F] dated 24/04/2019 ) GCG TR. C.M.P(MD).No.162 of 2019 24.04.2019 KM/(07.05.2019) 3P 4C