Sirumbayee v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/02/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR Sirumbayee ... Petitioner/Name Not found in the FIR Vs State through The Inspector of Police, Mayanur Police Station, Karur District in Crime No.577 of 2020.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sridharan, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in crime no.577 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as Accused No.rank not known, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 379 of I.P.C., and r/w Section 21
(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.577 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused said to have illegally transported 50 bags of river sand by using Tractor. Hence, a complaint has been registered. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
1/3
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the house wife and she is the owner of the vehicle. He further submitted her husband is a driver and only on sentimental purpose, the vehicle was purchased in her name. Except that purpose, she is no way connected with the alleged occurrence. He further submitted that A1 has purchased the vehicle and used the same for hire. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.
6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a lady and her name was used for sentimental reason other than she is no way connected with this case and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioner shall draw a demand draft in favour of Dean, Government Medical College Hospital, Karur, for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) without prejudice to her rights and contentions before the trial Court. The petitioner shall produce the proof of remittance /submission of Demand Draft to Dean while executing sureties. On acknowledgment of the same by the Dean, Government Medical College Hospital, Karur, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or her appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Krishnarayapuram, Karur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
2/3
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 23/02/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KRISHNARAYAPURAM, KARUR DISTRICT.
2.-DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYANUR POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
COPY TO: THE DEAN, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KARUR.
+1 CC to Mr.G.SRIDHARAN, Advocate ( SR-1348[I] dated 24/02/2021 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.2795 of 2021 Date :23/02/2021 vsg AE/PN/SAR-IV (26/02/2021) 3P / 7C 3/3