Maharajan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.23334 of 2015 MAHARAJAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.160 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S K.PARAMASIVAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, in Crime No.160 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 506(i) IPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner attacked and threatened the defacto complainant with criminal intimidation.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that injured has already been discharged from hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact the injured has already been discharged from hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 10/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI,DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL.

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S K.PARAMASIVAM Advocate SR.No.70665

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23334 of 2015 Date :10/12/2015 RG.JGB-DP/SAR-I 11.12.2015 2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/