← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2361/2024dismissed

Senthilkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-02-15Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI SENTHILKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANJUGRAMAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.20 OF 2024.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.RAAMAKRISHNAN KA., Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.MANIKANDAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER:

FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO.20 OF 2024 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC in Cr.No.20 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/3

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant with regard to consuming alcohol in the defacto complainant's land, due to which, the petitioner and his cousin brother stabbed the defacto complainant with aruval. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD)No.1212 of 2024 was dismissed by this Court on 30.01.2024. It is a case and case in counter. Counter complaint has been registered in Crime No.22 of 2024 and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the State submitted that earlier bail petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court, on 30.01.2024 and there is no change of circumstance and hence, he vehemently, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no change of circumstance, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

2/3

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 15/02/2024 / TRUE COPY / /02/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DSS TO THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANJUGRAMAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN Date :15/02/2024 PKP/GS/SAR /20.02.2024/ 3P/ 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3