← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/334/2026dismissed

Khadar Ibrahim, v. Subaitha Begam,

2026-02-10Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 10.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P(MD). No.334 of 2026 and C.M.P(MD) No.1513 of 2026 Khadar Ibrahim ... Petitioner Vs 1.Subhaitha Begum 2.Amran Hussain 3.Umaima Rasmi ... Respondents PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam passed in I.A. No.313 of 2024 in O.S.No.114 of 2024 dated 19.08.2025 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Vijayasri for Mr.K.Narayanan 1/4

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam, in I.A.No.313 of 2024 in O.S.No.114 of 2024, whereby the application for interim injunction filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The trial Court dismissed the injunction application on the ground that the matter requires a full-fledged trial and that the issues involved have to be adjudicated on the basis of evidence.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is facing day-to-day interference from the respondent and therefore, sought an order of interim injunction to enable him to run his business without disturbance.

4. It is well settled that the grant of temporary injunction is a discretionary relief vested with the trial Court. When the trial Court, upon consideration of the pleadings, has come to the conclusion that the 2/4

matter requires trial and adjudication on evidence, this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, would not ordinarily interfere with such discretionary orders, unless the same is shown to be perverse or arbitrary.

5. This Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the trial Court warranting interference.

6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No 10.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Indu 3/4

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

Indu 10.02.2026 4/4