Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/619/2017ordered

Jerald Jeya Seelan, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-02-13Honourable Mr Justice A.M. Basheer Ahamed2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL MP(MD) No.619 AND 1335 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.21571 of 2016 1 JERALD JEYA SEELAN, 2 GODWIN, 3 PONS RAVIKUMAR, 4 PILIP, 5 ALEXENDER, 6 SUNILKUMAR, 7 JENO @ VERGIN JENO, 8 MOSES, ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN CRL MP(MD)NO.619/2017 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.21571/2016 MOSES ... PETITIONER/8TH PETITIONER IN CRL MP(MD)NO.1335/2017 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.21571/2016 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.516/2016) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT in both the petitions PRAYER IN CRL MP(MD)NO.619/2017 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.21571/2016 : Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No.21571 of 2016 dated 24.11.2016.

Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 1335/ 2017 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.21571/2016 : Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the absence of the petitioner before the Honourable Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel in 25/01/2017 in Crl.O.P.No.21571/16 dated 24/11/2016 and pass such further or other orders as this Honourble Court may deem fit and proper in this circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of

M/S.T.ARUL, Advocate for the petitioner in both the petitions and of MR.P.KANDASAMY, Government Advocate (Crl.side) in both the petitions on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2.A report dated 02.02.2017 received from the Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, reveals the fact that the petitioner has complied with the condition from 15.12.2016 to 02.02.2017 except one day ie., on 25.01.2017 in respect of 8th petitioner.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the 8th petitioner was taking treatment on 25.01.2017, he was not able to comply with the condition by producing the medical record. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the absence of the 8th petitioner on 25.01.2017 is condoned and the condition is relaxed. These petitions is ordered accordingly. sd/- 13/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL.

2 -DO THROUGHTHE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. C.C. to M/S.T.ARUL Advocate SR.No.8265

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.619 AND 1335 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.21571 of 2016 Date :13/02/2017 GJM/SV-MMS/SAR-I/16.02.2017 :2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/