Mariapushpam Alias Thangam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5164 of 2018 1 MARIAPUSHPAM ALIAS THANGAM 2 SAMUVEL 3 PACKIATHAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.2 to 4 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, UTHUMALAI, V.K.PUDUR (TK), TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.68/2018.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.BASKAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners / accused Nos.2 to 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, on the file of the respondent police and they seek anticipatory bail. 2.The first petitioner and the third petitioner are women. The second petitioner is aged around 70 years. The case in question was registered following the wall dispute. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.68 of 2018, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, Uthumalai, V.K.Pudur-(TK), Tirunelveli District.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.Considering these aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, Tirunelveli District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 04/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGULAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, UTHUMALAI, V.K.PUDUR (TK), TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.BASKAR Advocate SR.No.5359.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5164 of 2018 Date :04/04/2018 SDS/CM:VR/SAR.3/09.04.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/