← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3502/2020dismissed

Santiagu Nagar And Surrounding Nagars v. The Commissioner Of Tiruchirapalli

2025-07-15Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P(MD)No.2971 of 2020 Santiagu Nagar and Surrounding Nagars, House Owners, Residents Welfare Society - K.K.Nagar, Represented by its President, G.Amirthalingam.

... Petitioner vs.

1.The Commissioner of Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirapalli Municipal Corporation, Trichy - 620 001.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Tiruchirappalli, Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli - 620 001.

3.The Asst. Director/Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, No.10 Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 620 001.

1/6

4.P.C.Slevaraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to establish a park in the place earmarked for public purpose, community purpose in the approved Santiagu Nagar Layout situated in Kottapattu Village, K.K.Nagar Post, Trichy in consonance with the conditions of plan approval for the benefits of the residents of Santiagu Nagar Layout on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandakumar For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.K.R.Kishore Ram for M/s.R.B.Law Associates For R - 3 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader For R - 4 : No appearance 2/6

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The writ on hand has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to establish a park in the area earmarked for public purpose/community purposes in the approved Santiagu Nagar layout situated in Kottapattu Village, K.K.Nagar Post, Trichy in consonance with the conditions of the layout plan approval for the benefits of the residents of Santiagu Nagar layout, based on the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2020.

2.The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2/Tiruchirappalli Corporation submitted that the subject land is a vacant land as of now and ear-marked for the establishment of a park. 3.The Corporation will either develop a park in that locality or maintain the land in its present condition until a decision is made to develop the park. However, the Corporation has no proposal to convert the park land 3/6

for any other purpose.

4.The fourth respondent, who had attempted to construct a Kalyanamandabam in the land earmarked for the park, filed W.P(MD)No. 19299 of 2017 and the learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition on 28.02.2025.

5.In view of the above submissions, no further adjudication is required. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S.,J.] & [S.S.Y.,J.] 15.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps 4/6

To 1.The Commissioner of Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirapalli Municipal Corporation, Trichy - 620 001.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Tiruchirappalli, Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli - 620 001.

3.The Asst. Director/Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, No.10 Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 620 001.

5/6

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM , J.

and S.SRIMATHY , J.

ps ORDER MADE IN DATED : 15.07.2025 6/6