← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2525/2025allowed

Sathiyamoorthy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-02-10Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.02.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Sathiyamoorthy ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District.

Crime No.1 of 2025 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Vishnu For Respondent :

Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 06.02.2025 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

1/5

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 in Crime No.1 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 02.01.2025, the petitioner and another person assaulted the defacto complainant's husband with wooden log and caused injuries to his head and body. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.J.Vishnu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrayed as an accused falsely. The petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that the defacto complainant's husband was admitted in the hospital on 03.01.2025 and discharged on 06.01.2025. The petitioner has no previous case. However, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. The petitioner has permanent residence and deep roots in the Society and therefore, there is less possibility of absconding. Considering the above and considering the nature of the offences alleged against the petitioner and taking note 2/5

of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner has no previous case, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai;

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity;

(iii) Thereafter, the petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondentPolice daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders; (iv) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai; (v) The petitioner shall not enter into the defacto complainant and her 3/5

husband's house or workplace;

(vi) The petitioner shall not try to contact the defacto complainant and her husband either directly or through any electronic mode; (vii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant or her husband and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence; and (viii) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, concerned Magistrate, or Trial Court as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by them as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

sd/- 10/02/2025 / TRUE COPY / /02/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MBI 4/5

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR, MADURAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2525 of 2025 Date :10/02/2025 SS/SKN/SAR- /20/02/2025/ 5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5