Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1803/2018disposed of

M.Subramani v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-01-31Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.01.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM W.P.(MD) No.1803 of 2018 M.Subramani ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Superintendant of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ayyakudi Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant to stage Adal Padal Dance Programme in the Pongal Festival of Arulmigu Periyadavar Sidhar Pon Maruthu Temple at Athithiravedar Street, Ayyakudi (po), Dindigal District on the night of 04.02.2018 at 7.00 p.m to 10.30 p.m.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.N.Shanmuga Selvam Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to grant permission to Adal Padal Dance Programme in the Pongal Festival of Arulmigu Periyadavar Sidhar Pon Maruthu Temple at Athithiravedar Street, Ayyakudi (p.o), Dindigal District on 04.02.2018 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.01.2018.

2.Heard, Mr.N.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Shanmuga Selvam, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is one of the committee members of the said Temple. The villagers are conducting the Adal Padal Dance Programme for several years and this year, they have decided to conduct the Adal Padal Dance Programme on 04.02.2018 and for that ,they have already given a representation dated 19.01.2018 to the second respondent, but, sofar, no order has been passed. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition.

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has not raised any serious objection. 4.Considering the aforesaid submissions, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 19.01.2018 and dispose of the same at early by keeping in mind the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Church of God (Full Gospel) in India Vs. K.K.R, Majestic Colony Welfare Association and Ors, reported in 2001 - 1 - L.W. (Crl.) 233.

5.With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendant of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ayyakudi Police Station, Dindigul District.

+1cc to Mr.N.SARAVANAN,Advocate,SR.45500 W.P.(MD) No.1803 of 2018 31.01.2018 GSP KK/SV MMS/SAR 4/01.02.2018/ 2P- 4C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/