← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23777/2015allowed

P. Ragupathy v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-12-15Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.12.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23777 of 2015 1.P.Ragupathy 2.P.Jeyakumar ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 Vs.

1.The State rep.by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Thoothukudi District (Crime No.322 of 2015) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.M.Subburaj ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records and quash all further proceedings in Crime No.322 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent.

For Petitioners :

Mr.S.Mohan Gandhi For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 :

Mr.D.Anbarasu

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.322 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent.

2. It is seen that the above said case has been registered for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC., against the petitioners / Accused.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent/defacto complainant, have appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The counsel appearing on either side would submit that a Compromise Memo has been filed stating that, since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the Compromise Memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping these matters pending. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Crime No.322 of 2015, on the file of the first respondent, in so far as the petitioners are concerned, is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The compromise memo shall form part of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Thoothukudi District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.S.M.MohanGandhi,Advocate Sr.No.72477 mpk AA/SKS-RR/05.01.2016/2p-4c Crl.O.P.(MD) No.23777 of 2015 15.12.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/