Maniraja C v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.02.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.Maniraja ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 07.04.2023 at 07.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Thirukovil at Seelayampatti Village, Theni Taluk, Theni District. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6
O R D E R
The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 07.04.2023 at 07.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Thirukovil at Seelayampatti Village, Theni Taluk, Theni District.
2. Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that Thiru Vizha for the temple, by name, "Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Thirukovil" situated at Seelayampatti Village, Theni Taluk, Theni District, is going to be held on 07.04.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 07.04.2023 at 07.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m., they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 02.02.2023. But, the second respondent has not 2/6
considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the second respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc. 007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 02.02.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular. 3/6
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
13.02.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Theni District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/6
5/6
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J csm Order made in Dated : 13.02.2023 6/6