Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23806/2014ordered

Lawrence v. The Inspector Of Police

2014-12-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23806 of 2014 LAWRENCE ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DSITRICT.

CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2014.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner prays for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C., on the file of the respondent police.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in his favour.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that petition enquiry is pending. However, she submits that on conclusion of the enquiry, there is possibility of registering the case for cognizable offences.

4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum to their satisfaction;

(ii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii)the petitioner shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily twice i.e., at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m until further orders.

sd/- 30/12/2014 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL.

2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DSITRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.69266 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23806 of 2014 Date :30/12/2014 PBK 31/12/2014 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/