Dhanalakshmi v. Inspector Of Police
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.23812 of 2014 1 DHANALAKSHMI 2 ARJUNAN 3 MANIMAHALAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINALAPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.ANGUSAMY Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- 12/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NO.III, DINDIGUL.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SINALAPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.23812 of 2014 Date :12/08/2015 GJM/SAR/J/17.8.15-1P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/