← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23855/2014ordered

Kandakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2014-12-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23855 of 2014 1 KANDAKUMAR 2 DURGAIMUTHU ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DT, CRIME NO.293/2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.DURAIRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 353 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. r/w Section 21 of Mines and Minerals Act, in Crime No.293 of 2014 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the vehicle has been seized by the Deputy Tahsildar, and the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side). 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikuntam, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily twice i.e., at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2014 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNTAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , TUTICORIN. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.R.DURAIRAJ Advocate SR.No. 69372. TS/31.12.2014/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23855 of 2014 Date :30/12/2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/