M.Selvamani v. The General Manager,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.03.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.2231 of 2018 M.Selvamani ... Petitioner Vs.

The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli.

... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of conductor as per the call letter dated 01.12.2014 in any one of the existing vacancy. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.K.Sathiyasingh

ORDER

The petitioner was a candidate for the post of Conductor in the respondent corporation. In the year 2014, the recruitment process was conducted. The interview was also held on 06.12.2014. The petitioner was a participant. Since the petitioner was not informed of the results of the interview, he has filed the present writ petition for directing the respondent to appoint him to the post of conductor as per the letter dated 01.12.2014. 2.When the matter was taken up for disposal, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the interview https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ process was already over and that the writ petitioner was not

selected. Based on the call letter, appointment order cannot be issued. The candidate in question will have to be successful and selected in the interview. In this case he was not successful. Therefore, he was not given appointment. There is no merit in this writ petition.

3.This writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar + 1 CC TO Mr.K.SATHIYA SINGH, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 53489 + 1 CC TO Mr.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 53956 RMI TE/KK/SAR-2 : 20/03/2018 : 2P/3C W.P.(MD)No.2231 of 2018 07.03.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/