N.Chandra Babu v. Dr.R.Raj Bhaskar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 23.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR N.Chandra Babu ... Petitioner Vs 1.R.Raj Bhaskar 2.P.Ramesh Vyravan 3.Sudha 4.Aroon 5.M.Ramesh 6.The HDFC Bank, No.5199, Sivam Towers, Opposite to Devar Hall, West Bouleward Road, Trichy ... Respondents PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the docket order dated 02.01.2026 in filing number TNTP010089162025 in OP/2381/2025 in Arb No. 3/2021 and direct the Principal District Judge, Trichy, number the petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Nambi Selvam 1/5

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the docket order dated 02.01.2026 made in Filing No.TNTP010089162025 in OP/2381/2025 in Arb No.3 of 2021 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that as against the award made in Arb.No.3 of 2021, dated 01.03.2023, he had preferred the present petition and on 02.01.2026, the same had been returned by the Court below on the ground of maintainability. Challenging the same, the present Revision.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterating all the contentions set out in the memorandum of Civil Revision Petition would submit that the return made by the Court below is a ministerial act. He would further submit that if the present petition is not numbered, the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and hardship. Therefore, he seeks interference of this Court with the order impugned in this Civil Revision Petition.

2/5

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and records perused. Since no adverse order is going to be passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is dispensed with. 5.It is to be noted that when an application/appeal filed by a person has been returned on the ground of maintainability by a Court, it is for him/her to assail reasons as to how such an application/appeal is maintainable before such Court. 6.Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after perusal of the averments made in the petition, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to represent the petition in Filing No.TNTP010089162025 in OP/2381/2025 in Arb No.

petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks therefrom.

7.The Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of, with the aforesaid directions. No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No 23.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To The Principal District Judge, Trichy 4/5

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

mm 23.02.2026 5/5