Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/365/2022allowed

Nagoor Kani v. Ramu

2022-02-28Honourable Mrs Justice S.Ananthi (Retd.)2 pages

C.R.P.(MD).No.365 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI C.R.P.(MD).No.365 of 2022 Nagoor Kani ... Petitioner/ 13th Defendant Vs.

1.Ramu 2.Nageshwari 3.Masila 4.Buvaneshwari ...1 to 4 Respondents/ Plaintiffs 5.Balu 6.Soundaravalli 7.Muruganantham 8.Rani 9.Karuppiah 10.Ponnammal 11.Saroja 12.Amuthavalli 13.Poomayil 14.Ajith 15.Panchavarnam 16.Durairaj 17.Rajeshwari 18.Muthunayagi ...5 to 18 Respondents /1 to 12,14,15 Respondents (Respondents 5 to 18 not necessary parties.

Hence, the respondents 5 to 18 notice may be dispensed with) PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.87 of 2015 within the time fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.J.M.Hassanul Bazari

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.87 of 2015 within the time fixed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P.(MD).No.365 of 2022 2.The suit in O.S.No.1243 of 2015 was filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff for relief of partition and separate possession. The B-diary extracts would show that the suit is pending since 05.10.2015 and is being adjourned frequently for enquiry and the issues have been framed in this matter on 15.06.2020. Therefore, the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram, is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.87 of 2015 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3.With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To The Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.

C.R.P.(MD).No.365 of 2022 28.02.2022 cp MS/10.03.2022/2P.2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2