Ramalingam v. The State

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.24525 of 2015 1 RAMALINGAM 2 MANIMARAN ... PETITIONERS/ 1&2 ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK, POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 1031 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT(S) For Petitioner : Mr.D.SELVARAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.1031 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

3. Considering the facts that the injured has already been discharged from hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10:30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not. sd/- 21/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK, POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.75827

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24525 of 2015 Date :21/12/2015 sj NS/AAL-MPA/SAR II/22.12.2015 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/