Periyasamy Died Natarajan Died 1. Ravindran v. Pookkarandi Died 1. Angamuthammal

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI IN SA No.1252 of 2003 PERIYASAMY (DIED) NATARAJAN (DIED) 1 RAVINDRAN 2 RAJALAKSHMI 3 TAMILARASI ... PETITIONERS 1 TO 3/APPELLANTS 3 TO 5 4 PARVATHI 5 VAIDHEESWARAN ... PETITIONERS 4 & 5/ LEGAL HEIRS OF 1st APPELLANT/ PROPOSED APPELLANTS 6 & 7 6 POONGOTHAI 7 SELVI SAGUNTHALA 8 KRISHNAMOORTHI ... PETITIONERS 6 TO 8/ LEGAL HEIRS OF 2nd APPELLANT/ PROPOSED APPELLANTS 8 TO 10 Vs POOKKARANDI (DIED) 1 ANGAMUTHAMMAL 2 DHANAPACKIAM 3 NAGAPPAN 4 PACKIAM AMMAL 5 R.MUTHU 6 SUBRAMANIAN 7 MARUTHAIVEERAN 8 CHELLA PERUMAL 1/3

9 JEGANATHAN 10 RAVINDRAN 11 VENUGOPAL 12 PREMA 13 SEKAR ... RESPONDENTS 1 TO 13/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 14 Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 5576 days in filing the petition seeking to set-aside the abetment caused due to the death of the 2nd appellant in the above appeal.

PRAYER IN SA No.1252 of 2003:

To prefer the Memorandum of Second Appeal against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.NO.197 of 1999 on the file of Ist Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli dated 17-4-2002 confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.20/1987 on the file of District Munsif Court, Musiri dated 29-04-1994. ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.K.SENTHIL, Advocate for the petitioner, the Court made the following order:- On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that due to the death of the lower Court advocate, the parties could not contact the counsel on record in the appeal and there is a delay of 5576 days in taking steps for the deceased second appellant. 2.The reasons stated are not satisfactory. But the legal representative of the second appellant are necessary parties to the case. Hence this petition is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.5,500/-(Rupees Five Thousand Five Hundred only) to the Siddha unit on or before 20.04.2022.

3.Call on 25.04.2022.

sd/- 07/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

TO 1 THE I ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

2 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, MUSIRI.

COPY TO:

THE SIDDHA MEDICAL OFFICER, SIDDHA UNIT, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN in SA(MD) No.1252 of 2003 Date :07/04/2022 (2/2) SS/JM/SAR:II/13.04.2022 : 3P/4C 3/3