Rajalakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twelfth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.2459 of 2015 1 RAJALAKSHMI 2 PALANISAMY 3 VEERASAMY 4 RAMAN 5 SINNAN 6 KAMARAJ 7 DHASAN 8 MARIYAMMAL 9 LAKSHMI 10 SAMAYEE 11 ANDICHI 12 THUMMAYEE 13 MUTHULAKSHMI .
14 BAKYALAKSHMI 15 LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 39/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.S. SARAVANA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 143, 188 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.39 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate for the State.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that these petitioners had indulged in an agitation and there was a peace committee convened, wherein a quarrel ensued.
4. Since the allegation against the petitioners are not serious, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 shall stay at Madurai and report before Tallakulam Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m. and 6.30 p.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners 1, 4, 8 to 15 being ladies shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), whether these petitioners 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 are complying with the order or not.
sd/- 12/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. M.S. SARAVANA KUMAR Advocate SR.No.6578 RL/7C - 16/2/2015 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2459 of 2015 Date :12/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/