Illayaraja v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23.02.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR 1.Illayaraja 2.Sundaramoorthy ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.3&4 Vs State represented through The Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.43 of 2022)
...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : M/s.SANTHANAM RAJESH KUMAR.B. Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.R.SIVAKUMAR Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.43 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.3&4, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC r/w Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,1957 in Crime No.43 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on 17.02.2022, the petitioners have illegally transported one unit of gravel sand by using a Lorry. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. However, they would further submit that the petitioners, without prejudice to his right, is ready to deposit the amount that may be imposed by this Court.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioners have transported 1 unit of gravel sand illegally. He further submitted that the petitioners are having no previous cases. 1/3
5.Considering the above and also the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand and Five Hundred only)each to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Madurai District, without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District.
7.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.
[b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 23/02/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
2/3
Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
COPY TO:
THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.3720 of 2022 Date :23/02/2022 SA/SBN/SAR.4/02.03.2022/3P/6C 3/3