Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3223/2020dismissed

A.Ameer Maideen v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-03-09Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.3223 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/03/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN CRL OP(MD). No.3223 of 2020 and CRL.MP(MD)No.2400 of 2020

1. A.Ameer Maideen

2. A.Ahmed Rafi

3. A.Mathina Begam ... Petitioners/Accused Rank Not Known Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai.

(Crime No.Not Known) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : M/s.P.Yasmin Begum, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Known, on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of I.P.C., in Crime No.Not Known, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.This Court on 24.02.2020, when the petition for anticipatory bail was taken up for consideration, directed the respondent police restraining from arresting the petitioners till 09.03.2020. Since the matter pertaining to matrimonial dispute, this Court was not inclined to precipitate the issue by arrest of the accused persons. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.3223 of 2020 The husband of the de-facto complainant, who is the first petitioner herein, after getting an interim protection from this Court has attended the enquiry on 18.02.2020, promising the respondent police that he will come back on 21.02.2020 and participate in the further enquiry. But he has left the country on 22.02.2020. He had not cooperated with the investigation. 3.Since the first petitioner was not co-operating with the investigation, it is reported that the first petitioner has left the country and presently is not in India.

4.Taking note of the fact that neither the first petitioner/husband of the de-facto complainant nor his parents really is interested in reconciling the dispute, but trying to escape from clutches of law, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. sd/- 09/03/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-4975[I] dated 09/03/2020 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3223 of 2020 & CRL.MP(MD)No.2400 of 2020 Date :09/03/2020 MS/VR/SAR-4/17.03.2020/2P.4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2