← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3669/2020dismissed

Renista v. The Inspector General Of Police

2022-03-02Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Renista ... Petitioner -vs1.The Inspector General of Police, Chennai, Tamilnadu.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Alagar Koil Road, 3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

5.Muthukrishnan Sub-Inspector of Police, Aathoor Police Station, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

6.Robin ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to instruct the fifth respondent to return back the petitioner's original document No.3892/2011 and not to interfere the civil issue and by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 10.02.2020 and take appropriate action within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.M.Manivelpandian For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate For R5 : No appearance For R6 : Mr.C.Christopher 1/3

O R D E R

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the third respondent to instruct the fifth respondent to return back her original document No.3892/2011 and not to interfere the civil issue.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that based on the complaint given by the sixth respondent, the fifth respondent called the petitioner and in the course of enquiry, they received her original documents and obtained the signature in the white paper and therefore, she seeks a direction to return back her original document No.3892/2011 and not to interfere with the civil issue.

3. It is seen from the complaint of the 6th respondent dated 01.02.2020 that there is a civil transaction between the petitioner and the 6th respondent and the petitioner has given a complaint belatedly. There is no proof to produce the document before the police and hence, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. If at all the document is missing, it is well open to the petitioner to obtain certified copies from the Registration Department. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) am To 1.The Inspector General of Police, Chennai, Tamilnadu.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Alagar Koil Road, 2/3

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, ORDER MADE IN 02.03.2022 KVL/12.03.2022/3P/6C 3/3