← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2428/2026granted

Jeyanthan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Uvari

2026-02-06Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy7 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/02/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Jeyanthan, S/o.Rayar, Bharathar Uvari, Uvari, Tirunelveli District..

... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by In, Spector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

Cr. No.141 of 2022..

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :Mr.P.Suresh, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-32B. To release the petitioner on bail in C.C. No. 243 of 2023 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai and thus render justice.

1/7

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.12.2025 based on the NBW issued by the trial Court, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act and Section 77 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, in Crime No.141 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, which was taken on file as C.C.No.243 of 2023, seeks bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was regularly appeared before the trial Court. On 17.09.2025, the petitioner was not able to attend the trial Court. Hence, the trial Court issued NBW against the petitioner and he is in judicial custody from 04.12.2025.

Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

2/7

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has jumped out of bail during trial and thereafter he was secured through NBW on 04.12.2025. He further submitted that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is not commercial quantity. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner is jumped out of bail and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum 3/7

of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b]the petitioner shall report before the trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., and for all hearing dates without fail;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

4/7

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 06.02.2026 VSG 5/7

TO 1.The learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Uvari Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

6/7

S.SRIMATHY,J., vsg

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2428 of 2026 Date : 06/02/2026 7/7