Muthuvel, S/O. Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.24888 of 2015 MUTHUVEL, ... PETITIONER/ SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLIMANTHAYAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR.NO.296 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate(Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 353, 354 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.296 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and a false case has been foisted against him.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the petitioner in a drunken mood quarrelled with the defacto complainant and abused in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case , this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchathram and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (in each case) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ODDANCHATHRAM.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLIMANTHAYAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.76522. TS/30.12.2015/2P-6C/NGM-SS/SAR - II

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24888 of 2015 Date :29/12/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/