← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4410/2021dismissed

Kokilam.J v. The Secretary To Govt Of India

2021-03-04Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA J.Kokilam ... Petitioner -vs1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH, Ayush Bhawan, B-Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi - 110 023.

2.The Director, Central Council for Research in Siddha, Ministry of AYUSH, SCRI Building, Anna Government Hospital Campus, Arumbakkam, Chennai.

3.The Director, National Institute of Siddha, Tambaram Sanatorium, Tambaram, Tamil Nadu - 600 047.

4.The Director, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, S.No.115/1, Financial District, Nanakramguda, Hyderabad - 500 032.

5.The Chief Executive Officer, National Accreditation Board for Hosptial and Healthcare Providers (NABH), ITPI Building, 5th Floor, 4A, I.P.Estate, Ring Road, New Delhi.

6.United India Insurance Company Limited, Registered Office, 24, Whites Road, Chennai - 600 014.

... Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to ensure that the treatment under the Siddha system of medicine is covered under all types of policies issued by the Insurance Companies on par with Ayurvedic system of medicine. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.H.Velavadas for R.1 to R.5 *****

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] The matter has nothing to do with any public interest. 2.The petitioner subscribes to a particular system of medicine and wants the whole world to be converted to such philosophy.

3.The petitioner may use whatever channel that may be available to the petitioner to propagate his views. The Court does not have either the expertise or the inclination to promote a particular form of medicine unless there is a legislation in such regard.

4.It may also serve the petitioner well to approach the policy-makers so that an appropriate legislation may be brought. 5.W.P.(MD)No.4410 of 2021 is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) smn2/gk Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,

ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH, Ayush Bhawan, B-Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi - 110 023.

2.The Director, Central Council for Research in Siddha, Ministry of AYUSH, SCRI Building, Anna Government Hospital Campus, Arumbakkam, Chennai.

3.The Director, National Institute of Siddha, Tambaram Sanatorium, Tambaram, Tamil Nadu - 600 047.

4.The Director, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, S.No.115/1, Financial District, Nanakramguda, Hyderabad - 500 032.

5.The Chief Executive Officer, National Accreditation Board for Hosptial and Healthcare Providers (NABH), ITPI Building, 5th Floor, 4A, I.P.Estate, Ring Road, New Delhi.

04.03.2021 VB (15.03.2021) 3P 6C