Senthil Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.24957 of 2015 SENTHIL KUMAR ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

[CRIME NO.324/2015] ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.R.DURAI RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 323 of IPC and Section 4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.324 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m.,for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when required https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM.

2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate SR.No.76530

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24957 of 2015 Date :29/12/2015 RG.SK-SKN/SAR-II 30.12.2015 2P:6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/